The Social Media Lawsuit
Over 2,000 families, schools, and state governments have sued companies like Meta, TikTok, and Snap. They claim these apps were designed to be addictive—and that the companies knew they were hurting kids.
Official case name and court details
Case: In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation
Number: 4:22-md-03047-YGR
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California
"MDL" stands for Multidistrict Litigation—a way to handle many similar lawsuits together in one court.
What's This Case About?
This Multidistrict Litigation consolidates thousands of lawsuits alleging that social media companies knowingly designed products with features that addict minors and cause serious mental health harms.
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
active
"This litigation challenges the fundamental business model of the internet. If successful, it could force companies to redesign algorithms to prioritize safety over engagement."
Test Cases Going to Trial
With thousands of lawsuits, the court picked a handful to try first. These "test cases" will show how juries respond—and help everyone decide whether to settle or keep fighting.
Procedural Timeline
First Bellwether Trial Begins
Harford County Public Schools v. Meta et al. begins trial in Oakland, CA. First jury to hear evidence about social media design and youth mental health. Trial ongoing with 6-8 week expected duration. Verdict will influence thousands of pending cases.
Snap Settles Select Cases
Snap Inc. becomes first major defendant to settle, resolving an undisclosed number of cases including at least one bellwether. Terms confidential but signals significant litigation risk.
School Districts Can Proceed
Judge Rogers rules that school districts have standing to sue under public nuisance theory and can recover costs for mental health interventions, counseling, and crisis response.
School District Bellwether Cases Selected
Court selects six bellwether cases from school districts in Maryland (Harford County), Georgia, Kentucky, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Arizona. These test trials will determine the trajectory of the entire MDL.
Meta Motion to Dismiss Denied
Judge Rogers largely denies Meta's motion to dismiss claims brought by 30+ U.S. states, allowing state attorneys general claims to proceed alongside private litigation.
Internal Documents Ordered Produced
Court orders defendants to produce internal research, A/B testing results, and communications about minor safety. Expected to reveal extent of corporate knowledge about harms.
Motion to Dismiss Denied - Section 230 Ruling
In a landmark 65-page ruling, Judge Rogers holds that Section 230 does not protect defendants from product liability claims based on design features. Meta and other defendants must face negligence claims.
California State Court Section 230 Ruling
Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl rules that plaintiffs' claims in the California JCCP can proceed despite Section 230 protections and First Amendment challenges, allowing 800+ state court cases to advance.
Amended Master Complaint Filed
Plaintiffs file the 300+ page Amended Master Complaint detailing product liability theories and citing internal company documents showing defendants knew their products harmed minors.
California JCCP Consolidation
Over 800 social media cases consolidated in Los Angeles Superior Court under California's Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings (JCCP), assigned to Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl.
MDL Consolidation Ordered
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidates nearly 600 initial federal cases into MDL No. 3047 in the Northern District of California, assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.